Dalhousie University institution of Nursing, Forrest Building, 6299 south St, Halifax, Canada

Search for more papers by this author

Doctoral Student

Dalhousie University school of Nursing, Forrest Building, 6299 south St, Halifax, Canada

Search for much more papers by this author
Please testimonial our Terms and also Conditions that Use and check box listed below to re-publishing full-text version of article.

You are watching: Phenomenology of illness and disease

Shareable Link

Use the link listed below to re-superstructure a full-text version of this short article with your friends and also colleagues. Discover more.


Carel\"s score in Phenomenology of disease is twofold: to usage phenomenology to much better understand illness and also to to mark the worth of illness to philosophy. The an outcome is a publication that is pertinent to two very different readers: the clinician or health and wellness researcher, and the philosopher. I technique this evaluation as a registered nurse and also doctoral student, and, thus, my reading of the publication is seen with a clinician researcher lens. Those familiar with the background of phenomenology are likely to argue that a phenomenological therapy of condition is no novel, i beg your pardon Carel it s her highlights when differentiating her work from that of Merleau-Ponty, Sartre, Toombs, Svenaeus, and others.1(p36) She suggests that this works have actually primarily concentrated on details features the illness, together opposed to disease generally, vice versa, she seeks to construct a considerable phenomenology that illness.1(p36) Carel states that critical part that this general frame is the capability to account because that seemingly paradoxical phenomena such together traumatic expansion wherein individuals report better happiness after ~ a brush with major illness.1(p38) such a general framework is a worthy and valuable goal come both audiences of the text, and, in this effort, Carel greatly succeeds.


Carel\"s writing is a wonderful example of the strength of the phenomenological approach. Phenomenology of condition leaves the reader feeling a depths appreciation because that the suffer of serious condition generally, and breathlessness specifically. Her use of quotes and also stories is an effective and help to highlight the effect of illness on lived time, space, body, and also relation. An example of one such quote the highlights how disease affects our imagine future comes from Arthur Frank\"s2(p27) summary of his cancer diagnosis:

What was it favor to be told I had actually cancer? The future disappeared. Loved ones came to be faces ns would never ever see again. I felt ns was walking with a nightmare that was unreal by utterly real. <…> My body has become a kind of quicksand, and also I to be sinking into myself, right into my disease.

The message is affluent with examples like this, both native Carel\"s own experience and other released works. This method is an essential in the book\"s ability transform the summary to the concrete.

Carel restricts her initiatives to “serious, chronic, and life-changing ok health, together opposed to a cold or bout that tonsillitis.”1(p6) The very first chapter that the book summarizes the contribute to phenomenology that Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and also Sartre the are supplied through the book. This is a welcome piece of analysis for those coming from a clinical background since it introduces concepts with admirable clarity. Carel develops her general framework in Chapters 2 to Four and then applies it to the phenomenon of breathlessness in thing Five. The framework consists of a synthetic of Toomb\"s 5 losses of illness3; the objective body and also the human body as lived as presented by Husserl and developed through Merleau-Ponty4; Sartre\"s description of the objective, subjective, and intersubjective levels of the body5; and also the principle of the healthy body together transparent. This structure provides a convincing and also seemingly finish account that illness\" profound effects on our methods of being in the world and also provides important insights right into the relational facets of illness.

Chapters Six, Eight, and also Nine room applications of how this frame can aid to understand and resolve such problems as the principles of “ill however well,” the unintended marginalization of the expertise of patients (epistemic injustice), and illness as an invitation to approach (for both patient themselves, as well as philosophers through case study). These three chapters have significant implications and may offer as the groundwork because that exciting advances outside of philosophy. For example, a an overwhelming problem in the ar of health economics has been the the basic public normally underestimates the high quality of life proficient by those v severe illness or disability. Generally, national guideline bodies state that the public perception of quality of life in a provided health state should be provided in economic analyses (Canadian company for Drugs and Technologies in wellness , 2006). One argument that has been supplied to justification the use of publicly perceptions versus those life in a certain health state is the the observed distinction is simply the an outcome of adaptation.6 Carel\"s creating on the ide of “ill yet well” offers the philosophical foundation for an dispute that a brush with serious disease may assist draw fist to the fact of one\"s mortality and lead to improvements in quality of life that space independent of only adaptation. The ide of epistemic injustice will resonate with any kind of clinician, and Carel\"s said solution (the patience toolkit) is a worthy very first effort to help deal with this issue—I will discuss this in further information below.

As a clinician, I found Chapter seven “illness together being-towards-death” the end of place and also not vital to the overall thesis of the book. By the moment a reader has arrived in ~ this point, the prominence of our connection with death in shaping meaning, and also the function that illness can beat in illustration attention come our mortality, has currently been convincingly presented. The first half that the chapter provides background ~ above the prestige of fatality that makes much more sense to be featured in the earlier parts in the publication (and come some extent is, because that example, in the bodily doubt chapter). The second fifty percent attempts come restructure Heidegger\"s meaning of death in bespeak to permit it to be de-individuated and enable a relational being in the direction of death.1(p178) The result is an abrupt transition in the method of the book from one the is available to all audiences, to one the is thick and daunting to understand for those who do not have the requisite familiarity v Being and Time7 and also its criticisms. Numerous clinicians will be left wondering why it to be important and why it shows up so late in the book. This chapter could perhaps be supported by future work that will assist make clear why fatality needs to it is in de-individuated because that Carel\"s structure to it is in complete. Till then, this chapter will likely be of most interest to academic philosopher vice versa, the most crucial content for clinicians is covered in a an ext accessible means in previously chapters. While this chapter provides added depth and understanding, mastery the the contents at the level that is presented is no likely crucial in stimulate to use Carel\"s structure to clinical practice or theory propelled research.


As pointed out previously, Carel\"s framework and her conversation of the potential clinical utility is one of the most interesting possibilities stemming indigenous this book. In chapter One, Carel claims that phenomenology gives the way through which disease can be provided to “explore an separation, personal, instance life, that is meanings, goals, and values and also how ideal to change them in an answer to illness.”1(p15) A footnote hints to the promise the a “patient toolkit” the “aims at allowing this process.”1(p15) The toolkit itself falls somewhat flat, and, in this section, I explain how this framework and also a true “toolkit” strategy could cause a paradigm transition in clinical care.

The patient toolkit is presented as one possible solution come the worries of epistemic injustice questioned in thing Eight. Epistemic justice as identified by Fricker takes two forms: testimonial injustice in i beg your pardon the experiences and opinions the those in a disadvantaged place are ignored and also discounted, and also hermeneutical injustice which is as soon as the absence of “collective hermeneutical resource”8(p7) renders it impossible for a human being to explain their experience in a method that can be taken by others. Carel\"s toolkit take away the type of a workshop centred roughly a three step process she describes as bracketing the natural attitude, thematizing illness, and reviewing the okay person\"s being in the world.1(p201) Interestingly, Carel offers small discussion about the apparent conflict between her hermeneutic phenomenological approach and also her use of bracketing in the toolkit. She intends the process to focus attention in the experience of condition rather 보다 the objective fact of the disease, encourage factor to consider of the myriad ways through through the condition is proficient (eg, cognitive and emotional), and also gain brand-new understanding of exactly how the disease experience has readjusted the individual\"s means of being in the world.1(p201) the was originally intended as a patient resource but is likewise used with clinicians or combined groups. The workshop as explained seems unquestionably an useful in helping clinicians to revisit the way they method care and is comparable to various other arts-based programs intended to improve empathy and encourage a holistic method to care.9 in spite of this, ns do have actually some reservations regarding whether the toolkit as described will have the ability to realize that is potential.

The primary worry with the toolkit is that it is not really a toolkit in ~ all, yet an detailed full job workshop. There is no doubt that this format permits for a depth of reflection that would certainly be challenging or impossible to achieve otherwise, however it severely limits the capability of the intervention to reach large numbers of patient or clinicians. Possibly a workshop can be the primary form of the intervention, however a toolkit says something I, as a clinician, can turn come in the moment to assist support my assessment or chip far at part underlying epistemic injustice. Ns am reminded of the method in i beg your pardon the experience of postpartum parents in the NICU is consistently shaped through their response to standardization depression symptom inventories or screening scales. That is concerning to imagine come what level we may be failing to help our patient by assuring castle that worrying feelings room “normal” or by being unable to recognize the suffer they are describing. That is not unusual to have a sense that miscellaneous is gift missed, and one wonders if a phenomenological toolkit that could be quickly available could be supplied in this moments to assistance assessment, diagnosis, and also treatment.

The advantage of a appropriate “toolkit” strategy to Carel\"s idea is that it likewise carries v it the possibility of being an element of an entire phenomenological technique to care. Nursing has actually spent significant effort in occurring theories of caring the are free to Carel\"s framework and could assist to operationalize strategy to care.10 In this reimagination the the toolkit, the could come to be a main aspect of the means in which a nurse would technique care, similar to exactly how Jean Watson\"s Caritas processes have been transcribed onto cards and also paired v quotes and also images come encourage in-the-moment reflection and conversation. When admittedly less in-depth than a complete day workshop, this approach would seem to offer an ext promise in sustaining a sustained phenomenological approach to treatment which might benefit an ext patients end a longer duration of time.

See more: Why Are Japanese Eggs Orange Yolks? Why Are Japanese Eggs Orange


Despite part limitations, Carel\"s Phenomenology of illness shows up to have actually succeeded in occurring a frame of a phenomenology of condition that goes past descriptions of certain characteristics of, because that example, psychological disorders.11 The general, holistic strategy results in a frame that feels relevant to clinicians in wide settings. Her creating is engaging and evocative, and also she succeeds in laying the groundwork for technique to approach that has implications that selection from the everyday interactions between clinicians and patients, come the underlying disagreements for just how we know the impact of disease on happiness and quality of life.